Catholic Says Elect is Elect by God and pursued differently and Reformed Proofs
Catholic:
a special, efficacious assistance given to the elect that is not extended in the same way to every human being.
the grace which leads to perseverance is reserved for those He has elected
the predestination of some to the “last end” (eternal life) is distinct from the universal providence that governs all creatures.
The elect are “predestined” and therefore receive the specific aid of grace, whereas others are not given that particular grace.
the elect are equipped by a grace that precedes any human merit, while those who are not predestined do not receive that same grace.
The universal love of God does not imply an identical, relentless pursuit of every person toward salvation.
Consequently, while God’s love is universal and He wills the salvation of all in the abstract, the concrete, relentless “pursuit” of each soul—by means of efficacious grace—applies especially to the elect. The rest of humanity, though beloved, do not receive that same decisive, grace‑driven pursuit.
~~~~
The Church’s Fathers and Scholastics teach that God’s love embraces all humanity, but the means by which He brings each person to salvation are not identical for everyone.
- Augustine repeatedly affirms that God “loves mercy and truth” and that His mercy is offered to all, yet he stresses that election is a work of grace, not of any merit that a person possesses (On Rebuke and Grace 13)1. The elect are “made to differ from that original condemnation by such bounty of divine grace,” and their perseverance is secured by that grace (On Rebuke and Grace 13)1. This shows a special, efficacious assistance given to the elect that is not extended in the same way to every human being.
- Augustine also notes that God’s “goodness” is freely given, but that the grace which leads to perseverance is reserved for those He has elected (On Patience 19)2. He does not say that every person receives the same relentless “pursuit” of grace.
- Thomas Aquinas explains that election presupposes love, and that love “precedes election” in the divine order (Summa Contra Gentiles 164)3. Yet he makes clear that the predestination of some to the “last end” (eternal life) is distinct from the universal providence that governs all creatures (Summa Contra Gentiles 164)3. The elect are “predestined” and therefore receive the specific aid of grace, whereas others are not given that particular grace.
- In the Disputed Questions on Truth Aquinas argues that predestination is not caused by fore‑knowledge of merit and that “the grace of God, an effect of predestination, is not preceded by any merits, but precedes all merit” (Q 6 A 2)4. This again points to a differentiated operation of God’s grace: the elect are equipped by a grace that precedes any human merit, while those who are not predestined do not receive that same grace.
- Aquinas further states that love is the motive for election, but election itself is a particular act of the will that distinguishes some from others (Summa Theologiae I Q23 A4)5. The universal love of God does not imply an identical, relentless pursuit of every person toward salvation.
Consequently, while God’s love is universal and He wills the salvation of all in the abstract, the concrete, relentless “pursuit” of each soul—by means of efficacious grace—applies especially to the elect. The rest of humanity, though beloved, do not receive that same decisive, grace‑driven pursuit.
[1] On the Predestination of the Saints Book II, Chapter 41.— Predestination Defined as Only God's Disposing of Events in His Foreknowledge.
[2] On Patience 19
[3] On the Predestination of the Saints Book I, Chapter 38 [XIX.]— What is the View of the Pelagians, and What of the Semi-Pelagians, Concerning Predestination.
[4] On Grace and Free Will 38
[5] Disputed Questions on Truth Q. 6, A. 2, C.
~~~~~
The Catholic sources make clear several points that differ from the classic Reformed doctrine:
- Universal love and the will of salvation – Augustine affirms that God “loves mercy and truth” and that the salvific will of God is directed to all humanity (On Rebuke and Grace 13)1. This universal desire is not equated with an identical operation of grace toward every person.
- Grace as the decisive factor for the elect – Augustine says that the “grace which leads to perseverance is reserved for those He has elected” (On Patience 19)2. Aquinas likewise teaches that the grace which makes predestination effective “precedes all merit” and is given only to the predestined (Disputed Questions Q 6 A 2)3.
- Distinction between universal providence and particular predestination – In the Summa Contra Gentiles Aquinas explains that God’s providence governs all creatures, while “the predestination of some to the last end” is a special act of divine will (SCG III 164)4. The elect receive a specific aid of grace that the non‑elect do not receive.
- Love as the motive, not the mechanism – Aquinas holds that love “precedes election” (SCG III 164)4 and that election is a particular act of the divine will (ST I Q 23 A 4)5. The universal love of God therefore does not entail an identical, relentless “pursuit” of every soul toward salvation.
Aspect
Catholic (Augustine‑Aquinas)
Classic Reformed (Calvinist)
Universal salvific will
God wills the salvation of all in the abstract, but the efficacious grace that brings about that salvation is given only to the elect (see Augustine On Patience 19; Aquinas SCG III 164).
God’s sovereign decree actually elects some to salvation and passes over others; the universal will is understood as a “general” desire that does not entail saving grace for all (the “double‑predestination” formula).
Nature of grace
Grace is efficacious for the elect and sufficient(but not efficacious) for those who are not predestined; the elect receive a special, pre‑existent grace that precedes merit (Aquinas Q 6 A 2).
Grace is irresistible for the elect; those not elected receive no saving grace at all.
Human freedom
Even the elect cooperate freely with the moving grace; the grace does not destroy the power to refuse (Aquinas ST I Q 23 A 4).
The elect’s will is effectively bound by grace; their assent is not a free, independent act but a necessary result of God’s decree.
“Relentless pursuit”
The Church teaches that God’s providential care is universal, but the relentless operation of efficacious grace is reserved for the elect (Augustine On Patience 19; Aquinas SCG III 164).
The Reformed tradition speaks of God “pursuing” the elect with irresistible grace, while the non‑elect are simply passed over.
~~~~~
The reformed doctrine that Jesus died for the elect is often referred to as Definite Atonement or Limited Atonement, which means Christ's death was intentionally and effectively a substitutionary sacrifice for a specific group of people—the elect—thereby securing their salvation.
The following Bible verses are commonly cited by those who hold to this view to support the specific nature and extent of Christ's saving work:
Passages Emphasizing Jesus Died for a Specific Group:
* Matthew 1:21: "She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins."
* The argument is that Jesus's saving work is for "his people," not all people indiscriminately.
* John 10:11, 15: "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.... I lay down my life for the sheep."
* The argument is that Jesus lays down His life specifically for His "sheep" (the elect), not the "goats" or the whole world.
* John 15:13: "Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends."
* The focus is on His "friends" for whom He gives His life.
* Acts 20:28: "...be shepherds of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood."
* The purchase is explicitly for "the church of God."
* Ephesians 5:25: "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her."
* The parallel points to Christ's self-sacrifice being for "the church" (His bride).
Passages Highlighting Christ's Intercession for the Elect:
* John 17:9: (From Jesus' High Priestly Prayer) "I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours."
* The argument is that if Christ limits His intercession to those the Father gave Him, His atoning work (which intercession applies) is similarly limited in its specific intent.
* Romans 8:32-34: "He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us."
* The context of the sacrifice and intercession ("us all") is specifically "God's elect," assuring their complete salvation.
Passages on God's Sovereign Plan (Election):
* John 6:37, 39: "All that the Father gives me will come to me... And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day."
* This connects the Father's giving (election) directly to the Son's successful, complete saving work for that group.
* Hebrews 9:15: "Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant."
* The redemption is explicitly for "those who are called" (the elect).
Important Note: The doctrine of Definite/Limited Atonement is a point of significant debate within Christianity. While the verses above are used by Reformed theologians to define the design and efficacy of Christ's death for the elect, other theologians read these verses differently and emphasize verses like John 3:16 ("God so loved the world") and 1 John 2:2 ("propitiation... for the whole world") to argue for a universal sufficiency or availability of Christ's atonement, even if not all are ultimately saved.
Excellent question — and a key one for understanding Reformed (Calvinist) theology on particular redemption or limited atonement.
In Reformed theology, the claim is Jesus’ death effectively secured salvation only for the elect, not merely made it possible for all.
They teach that Christ’s atonement was definite—intended and accomplished for those whom the Father chose (John 6:37–40; Eph 1:4–5).
Below is a list of the main verses Reformed teachers and confessions (like the Westminster Confession and Canons of Dort) commonly cite to support this doctrine.
⸻
🔹 1. Verses showing Christ died for “His people,” “the sheep,” or “the church”
Matthew 1:21
“He will save his people from their sins.”
John 10:11, 14–15, 26–29
“The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep… I know my own and my own know me… I lay down my life for the sheep.”
Ephesians 5:25–27
“Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her…”
Acts 20:28
“…the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.”
Titus 2:14
“…who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession…”
John 17:9
“I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours.”
⸻
🔹 2. Verses showing Jesus’ death actually accomplishes salvation, not just makes it possible
Isaiah 53:10–11
“…when his soul makes an offering for guilt, he shall see his offspring… By his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous…”
John 6:37–39
“All that the Father gives me will come to me… and I will raise him up on the last day.”
John 10:27–29
“My sheep hear my voice… I give them eternal life, and they will never perish.”
Hebrews 9:12, 28
“…he entered once for all into the holy places… having obtained eternal redemption.”
“…so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear… to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”
Hebrews 10:14
“By a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.”
⸻
🔹 3. Verses showing the elect were chosen before the atonement and given to Christ
Ephesians 1:4–7
“He chose us in him before the foundation of the world… In him we have redemption through his blood…”
Romans 8:29–34
“…those whom he foreknew he also predestined… he also justified… Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died…”
John 17:2, 6, 9, 24
“You have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him.”
⸻
🔹 4. Verses emphasizing “many” rather than “all” in an exclusive sense
Matthew 20:28; Mark 10:45
“…the Son of Man came… to give his life as a ransom for many.”
Isaiah 53:11–12
“…he shall bear the sin of many…”
Romans 5:19
“By the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.”
⸻
🔹 5. Verses contrasting “world” and “elect” (interpreted in context)
Reformed theologians argue “world” in these verses often means people from all nations, not every individual:
John 3:16–17
“For God so loved the world…” (interpreted as the world of the elect from every nation).
John 11:51–52
“…he prophesied that Jesus would die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but also to gather into one the children of God who are scattered abroad.”
Revelation 5:9
“…for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.”
⸻
🔹 6. Summary Logic (Reformed reasoning)
1. The Father elects a definite number of people. (Eph 1:4–5)
2. The Son dies to save those exact people. (John 10:11; Eph 5:25)
3. The Spirit applies that salvation infallibly. (John 6:37–39; Rom 8:30)
4. Therefore, the atonement is definite in design and effect, not general and potential.
⸻
Jesus died for his church and not all humanity is part of the church, only those whom the father draws to Jesus.
He will save his people from their sins
The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep… I know my own and my own know me… I lay down my life for the sheep.”
Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her…”
the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.
All that the Father gives me will come to me… and I will raise him up on the last day.
I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours.
those whom he foreknew he also predestined… he also justified… Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect?
You have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him.
For God so loved the world…” (interpreted as the world of the elect from every nation).
for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.”
The Father elects a definite number of people. (Eph 1:4–5)
2. The Son dies to save those exact people. (John 10:11; Eph 5:25)
3. The Spirit applies that salvation infallibly. (John 6:37–39; Rom 8:30)
4. Therefore, the atonement is definite in design and effect, not general and potential.
Isn’t this the teaching of Augustine and Aquinas, God chooses and efficiently saves an elect He gives to Jesus whom will not be lost.
Augustine repeatedly stresses that election is a work of grace, not of merit. He writes that those “made to differ from that original condemnation by such bounty of divine grace” are called and believed “by the election of grace” (cf. On Rebuke and Grace 13)1. In On the Predestination of the Saints he defines predestination as “God’s disposing of events in His fore‑knowledge” and rejects any notion that it is based on human merit (cf. Book II 41)2. Augustine also says that the “remnant by election of grace is saved” and that this election “goes before all good merits of men” (cf. On Patience 17)
Augustine presents predestination as “an appeal, an invitation which attracts and seeks to persuade” and that “the infallibility of the result is assured by the Divine knowledge which directs the choice of the invitation”4. He affirms that God foreknows who will cooperate with grace, but that the possibility of salvation remains open to all; the “lists are closed” only because God knows in advance who will freely accept, not because He has arbitrarily barred anyone else4.
Thomas Aquinas treats predestination as a part of divine providence that is certain yet compatible with human freedom. In the Summa he explains that predestination “most certainly and infallibly takes effect; yet it does not impose any necessity… free‑will is not destroyed” (Q. 23, A. 6)5. He also holds that election is real: “God chooses us in Him before the foundation of the world” (Q. 23, A. 4)6, but this election is gratuitous and not based on any prior merit.
Aquinas does not teach a limited atonement; rather, he affirms that Christ’s sacrifice is sufficient for all, and that the Holy Spirit applies it infallibly to those who freely accept.
Thus, Catholic doctrine holds two complementary truths:
- Universal sufficiency – Christ’s atoning death is a gift to the whole world, intended for all peoples, nations, and languages (cf. Eph 1:4‑5, John 10:11).
- Particular efficacy – The grace that makes salvation effective is applied by the Holy Spirit to those who, by free cooperation, accept it; these are the “elect” in the sense of those who respond to God’s gracious invitation.
In short, Augustine and Aquinas do not teach a strictly “limited atonement” in the Calvinist sense; they articulate a doctrine of universal grace made effective for the elect, fully compatible with the Catholic Church’s teaching that Christ died for the whole world and that the Holy Spirit offers that saving grace to every person.
but in reality the devil steals the word before it takes root in those who are not efficiently called and this is part of the grand plan for his glory.
the Church affirms that the devil’s activity is always limited by the sovereign will of the Father, who alone can bring the Word to its intended end.
Thus, while the devil can deceive, he cannot overturn the salvific plan that God has instituted in Christ.
Aquinas clarifies that predestination is “certain and infallibly takes effect, yet it does not impose any necessity on the human will” (Summa Theologiae I‑Q. 23‑A. 6, source 11)7. The Church therefore teaches that those who are “efficiently called” receive the Holy Spirit’s grace that makes the Word take root; those who do not cooperate freely remain outside that efficacious grace, not because the devil has a predetermined plan for their loss, but because they have freely rejected the invitation (cf. CCC 600, source 30).
- Sufficient grace = the universal gift of Christ’s sacrifice, offered to all men.
- Efficacious grace = the grace that, through free cooperation, actually brings about salvation in the elect.
The devil can obstruct the reception of efficaciousgrace by tempting, deceiving, or “stealing the Word,” but he cannot prevent God’s sufficient grace from being present in every person (CCC 600).
Why not all are saved
The Church holds that God “wills all men to be saved” (CCC 1037) yet respects the freedom He gave each person (CCC 1730). When a person freely rejects the invitation, the grace that was sufficient for him remains unsheathed but uneffective in his life. This is not a failure of God’s intention, but the genuine exercise of human freedom (see Aquinas, De Causality of Prayer and the Execution of Predestination). The devil’s “grand plan” to keep some from the Word is therefore not part of God’s salvific design; it is the tragic result of the misuse of freedom that God permits in order to preserve true love (CCC 2852)6.
not all men will be saved. The Church holds that God’s ultimate purpose is the salvation of the whole world, but that purpose is fulfilled only insofar as each person freely accepts the grace offered. The devil’s limited power can prevent some from receiving efficacious grace, and those who persist in rejecting it incur the self‑imposed consequence of eternal separation.
When a person persists in mortal sin and definitively rejects God’s mercy, the result is “eternal separation from God… called hell”
Thus, while God’s grace is sufficient for every human being, it becomes efficacious only when a person freely cooperates with it. The devil may “steal the Word” and tempt people to reject the invitation, but he cannot override the freedom that God has given to each soul.
From Blogger iPhone client
