Some Elect, some allowed to reject-God selectively chooses who receives predestination grace and permits others to fall.-Pray to be Elect!
some are just not chosen to be elect, Pharos, Esau, Judas yes or no
Answer
The question of whether certain individuals like Pharaoh, Esau, and Judas were "not chosen to be elect" touches upon the complex Catholic doctrines of divine election, predestination, and reprobation, while also affirming human free will and God's universal salvific will.
Divine Election and Reprobation
In Catholic theology, divine election refers to God's eternal choice of certain individuals for salvation and grace 12. This election is a part of God's providence, by which He guides all things to their ultimate end 12. Predestination is the pre-ordination of some to be guided to their last end 12. Reprobation, conversely, is God's eternal arrangement not to give grace to some, permitting them to fall away from that end 5 12. This does not mean God actively causes sin, but rather permits it 510.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that God, in His eternal plan of "predestination," includes each person's free response to His grace 1. God permits acts that flow from human blindness for the sake of accomplishing His plan of salvation 1. From the greatest moral evil—the rejection and murder of His Son—God brought about the greatest good: the glorification of Christ and our redemption 2.
Pharaoh
The Bible speaks of God hardening Pharaoh's heart (e.g., Exodus 9:12). This is a profound mystery that Scripture presents, challenging theologians to balance God's universal love and grace with His free election to allow some to remain in sin 16. God's providence extends over all things, including the free will of humans 4. While God does not restrain the wicked from the evil of sin, He does not entirely withdraw His providence from them 4. The hardening of Pharaoh's heart can be understood not as God directly causing Pharaoh to sin, but rather as God permitting Pharaoh's obstinacy to manifest, thereby demonstrating His power and fulfilling His divine plan.
Esau
The Scripture states, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated" (Malachi 1:2-3) 5 12. This passage, particularly in Romans 9:10-13, can be interpreted in two ways:
- Temporal Election: It can refer to a selective temporal election by God, such as the mission of Israel initially, and later that of the Gentiles within the Church 10. This means God chose Jacob's descendants for a particular historical mission, not necessarily denying Esau's eternal salvation.
- Refusal of Grace: In the context of eternal salvation, it denotes God's "supreme initiative" of love for both Jacob and Esau, with Esau's "hatred" referring to his refusal of this love, for which he is subject to judgment 10. God knows from all eternity the refusal of some who will not receive the gift of life 10. Therefore, if someone is not among the predestined, it is a consequence of their free refusal of God's prevenient grace 10.
Judas
Judas Iscariot's betrayal of Jesus is another example of a moral evil that God permitted for the sake of His salvific plan 12. While Judas freely chose to betray Christ, this act was included in God's eternal plan 1. God's providence works through the actions of creatures, and human beings are granted the ability to cooperate freely with His plans 3. Judas's actions, though sinful, ultimately served God's greater purpose of redemption. The Church teaches that God permits evil to draw a greater good from it 2.
Conclusion
The Catholic understanding of election and reprobation affirms that God's will for salvation is universal, offering the possibility of eternal salvation to all 10. However, it also acknowledges that God, in His eternal plan, foresees and permits the free refusal of some individuals to accept His grace 10. Therefore, while God does not predestine anyone to hell, He knows from all eternity those who will definitively reject Him 5 10. The cases of Pharaoh, Esau, and Judas illustrate the mystery of God's sovereign will interacting with human freedom, where God permits evil and even brings good from it, without ever being the cause of sin 2 10.
~~~~~
In Catholic theology, divine election refers to God's eternal choice of certain individuals for salvation and grace 12. This election is a part of God's providence, by which He guides all things to their ultimate end 12. Predestination is the pre-ordination of some to be guided to their last end 12. Reprobation, conversely, is God's eternal arrangement not to give grace to some, permitting them to fall away from that end 5 12. This does not mean God actively causes sin, but rather permits it 5 10 according to that statement, God selectively chooses who he will give the predestination grace to and let others fall. yes or no?
Answer:
Based on the statement provided, the answer is yes.
The statement indicates that "God selectively chooses who he will give the predestination grace to and let others fall" through the concepts of divine election, predestination, and reprobation .
- Divine Election and Predestination: The text states that divine election is "God's eternal choice of certain individuals for salvation and grace" and that predestination is "the pre-ordination of some to be guided to their last end" . This implies a selective choice by God for those who receive predestination grace.
- Reprobation: Conversely, reprobation is described as "God's eternal arrangement not to give grace to some, permitting them to fall away from that end" . The statement clarifies that this "does not mean God actively causes sin, but rather permits it" . This aspect confirms that God withholds grace from some, allowing them to fall.
Therefore, the statement supports the idea that God selectively chooses who receives predestination grace and permits others to fall.
~~~~
according to this statement: This aspect confirms that God withholds grace from some, allowing them to fall. God is not giving grace to all for salvation. yes or no
Answer
Based on the statement, the answer is yes.
The statement "God withholds grace from some, allowing them to fall" directly implies that God is not giving grace to all for salvation. If grace is withheld from some, then it is not universally given to everyone for the purpose of salvation.
~~~~
This statement: If grace is withheld from some, then it is not universally given to everyone for the purpose of salvation. Means that God is not only letting them reject some grace but in actuality is not even giving the grace to reject in other cases. Yes or no?
Answer
Based on the statement, the answer is yes.
The phrase "God withholds grace from some" implies that in these cases, the grace is not even offered or given, meaning there is no grace for those individuals to reject in the first place. It goes beyond merely allowing them to reject grace; it suggests an absence of that particular grace for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment